Skip to content

Hamas leader denies two-state reference

July 1, 2012

Wednesday, April 5. 2006
Mahmoud al-Zahar, the Palestinian foreign minister, has denied referring to a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict, as that would mean recognising Israel’s right to exist.

A senior Palestinian diplomat at the United Nations said on Tuesday that al-Zahar had made the reference in a letter he sent to Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, this week.

But al-Zahar told Reuters that “such a sentence was not used in the letter”.

A copy of the letter seen by Reuters also showed no reference to a two-state solution.

Hamas, which swept parliamentary elections in January, is sworn to Israel’s destruction and has vowed to keep fighting the Jewish state since taking over the Palestinian government last week. It says talks with Israel will be a waste of time.

Israel calls Hamas a terrorist organisation and has vowed not to negotiate with the group.

Conciliatory

Despite not referring to a two-state solution, al- Zahar’s letter to Annan was conciliatory for a Hamas leader with reputation as a hardliner.

Al-Zahar said his government wanted “to work with the United Nations and countries of the world … to achieve regional peace and stability based on a comprehensive and just solution.”

“We hope some countries will reconsider their positions and hasty decisions especially regarding stopping aid and the use of the language of threats instead of dialogue,” the letter added.

Israel and the United States have sought to isolate the Hamas government.

The “Quartet” of Middle East mediators – the United Nations, the United States, the European Union and Russia – has also said that aid will be cut if Hamas does not recognise Israel, renounce violence and accept interim peace agreements.

No debate

Riyad Mansour, the UN Observer for Palestine, speaking to reporters at the world body’s headquarters on Tuesday, had said that the choice of wording in al-Zahar’s letter was important, hinting at an evolution in Hamas thinking.

Mansour said the letter also referred to the Palestinian hope of wanting to live in peace “side by side with our neighbours”, which could have implied Israel.

The letter seen by Reuters did not include this.

Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas lawmaker, said recognising Israel was not up for debate, although he restated the group’s offer of a long-term truce if Israel was to fully withdraw from the land captured in the 1967 war.

Israel has dismissed such an offer as a non-starter.

“We speak about a Palestinian state, fully sovereign, with Jerusalem as its capital and on Palestinian lands occupied in 1967, as an interim solution. This is one item on the government agenda, but recognition of Israel is not,” he told Reuters.

Advertisements

From → News

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: